[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RAT test



Title: Re: RAT test
Naw, if God had been clearing her throat she'd have said, "Come in Radio Tokyo, Come in Radio Tokyo".  Huh, I'm not even sure I understand that.
I couldn't post to the RAT list before (for strange mysterious computer reasons) and all that got fixed yesterday.  I was feeling like the strange child in a big house who stood at the window and watched all the other children at play but couldn't play herself (or watched all the other children throw rocks at each other, whatever the case may be).
Now of course all I want to do is chime in on LAST week's topics -- "Foolin around with Obscurity" and "Grad School; Expensive Sheep Pen for the Stars."
 
I just got out of a very expensive Sheep Pen with an MFA in Directing.  I hated it at first and felt like I had landed in the set of the TV show FAME.  I despised every moment of it and complained violently to Chris Jeffries online.  His advice to me was "Steal everything that's not nailed down" and I tried my best.  Now, in retrospect I am glad I went.  I got a lot of tools that I wouldn't have had otherwise (some stolen, some earned).  But I was also pretty darn clear about why I was going in the first place -- and the reasons I went had nothing to do with meeting the "right" people or making connections.  I had all the connections I ever wanted from little old Annex Theatre in Seattle Washington and from Rat Conferences past and present.  I went to learn about Meyerhold and Giorgio Strehler and Shakespeare and Artaud and Christopher Marlowe and all the old dead guys that we had never gone near at Annex.  And I'm so thankful I did --   RAT's of the past, all of them.   And I'm a very different director as a result.
 
And let me tell you this... the people I knew at Yale were psyched by the RAT conference. One teacher, Ben Mordercai, who is a Broadway Producer (I say that so you know just how very un-RAT like he is), made articles about RAT required reading in his classes.  Even those people working for the Man, working for the stodgiest of all institutions recognize it is time for radical upheaval in the way we look at and make theater.  And particularly in the way the institutions that support theater and support artists are run.  And that is what I am most interested in talking about...
Regional theater was a radical concept when first proposed by people like Zelda Fichlander in the fifties.  So, where do we go now?  What radical concept do we create that will support the creation of new work on a large scale for the next thirty years?   Maybe I'm alone, but I for one believe that it is up to us.  And, in thirty years, some new bunch of smart-mouthed upstarts will come along and tell us we're fucked up and what we've created doesn't work. 
 
We need to (and I don't mean RAT, I mean us as a bunch of theater makers who seem to live below the radar) create new ways of making new work on a large scale.  And we can do it if we believe we can.  Any sense of victimization must stop -- "they" aren't keeping us from doing that.  "We" are keeping ourselves from doing that.
Ok now I sound like I'm about to offer you a free personality test if you'll just step inside...
 
Sorry for the lengthy post.  I'm just stretching my legs (they've been cooped up in a first class sheep pen for the last three years)
 
Love,
Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: chris mac <cmacdona@Adobe.COM>
To: rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com <rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com>
Date: Thursday, February 25, 1999 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: RAT test

Is that the sound of God clearing her voice?

Big kiss Allison.


...C

----------
From: "Allison Narver" <anarver@chesnutt.com>
To: "RAT" <rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com>
Subject: RAT test
Date: Thu, Feb 25, 1999, 5:59 PM


test. test. achem. is this thing on?
Allison Narver