[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: RAT Response to Online Theater Comments Re. Cat Hebert
A couple things:
1. I have been away from my email for a week so I am catching up on my email. I am replying midstream and I might be repeating something that has already been said. Sorry if this is the case.
2. Audie McCall, Allison, Peggy, Conrad...feels like old times!!!
3. There is a fundemental difference between an electronic or mechanical reproduction of a performance and a live performance. The experience is DIFFERENT. Not necessarily better or worse.
4. 90% of everything is crap. 90% of TV is crap. 90% of theater is crap. 90% of film is crap. 90% of photography is crap.
5. Nobody sets out to make a bad movie. Unbelievable as that may seem. This "movies and tv = bad art" thing that some RATS express have is bordering on moronic. Most movies suck but some are great. Movies and TV are made with the business side of show business more in mind. But you can't run a theater without keeping the business side in mind at little. (You can maybe put up One show with NO BUSINESS CONCERNS to cloud your pure art high. You'll probably end up in jail, however, or at least have most of the people involved hate you.)
Business is not just money. It's scheduling tech and rehearsal and having a box office person to greet the audience and sweeping the stage and printing the programs and all that stuff.
6. Obviously there is no easy way to make great art. That's why its so rare. What works for one person or group may not work for another.
That said the thing that REALLY bugs me is self righteousness. People who are self righteous really should take a long look at themselves and think really hard about where they get off declaring how people should act and....um.....hmmm....never mind.
Excelsior!!!
John
In a message dated Wed, 16 May 2001 10:07:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, Cat Hebert <virtualdrama@juno.com> writes:
<< Any medium is what it is made to be. If a particular experience requires
3D, 2D isn't going to cut it. (My main interest is immersive,
interactive, VR storytelling, so believe me, 2D performances don't excite
me.)
However, where the *dialogue* or the *content* of a piece are primary, a
2D translation can work somewhat better -- so the Gurney makes sense.
What people need to do is to make sure to include the interactive
component -- allowing people to talk to the characters or to talk with
the actors separately. That enhances the notion of community.
And... remember, I'm calling this hybrid form "theater" so that live
theater can get some bounceback from it. People noodling in front of a
camera isn't much different than people noodling in front of a campfire,
is it? *That* to me is theater -- the family, community basis of acted
out stories. The most powerful theater I've ever been part of was/is
various forms of psychodrama (my background is partly in clinical psych).
That doesn't translate well *at all* to non-interactive forms. And it
isn't really "professional" in the usual sense.
Since the hi-tech forms have hi-touch coming in the not-too-distant
future [just saw a great demo in NYC], I see theater as an ideal approach
to those new forms of storytelling. And I would like for an entire
generation (and not just a few of the anointed/selected/groomed) to have
access to the community-sharing that theater can bring.
Cheers,
Cat Hebert
>
> Your comments about doing online "theatre" do sound interesting. But
> of
> course, you're not talking about theatre. You're talking about
> people
> noodling in front of a camera. You're talking about more Internet
> "films."
> Yup, we sure need more of those.
>
> By definition, if it's got a camera on it, and/or it goes online,
> then it's
> TV or new media. If it's not driven by audience reaction (as in
> plays that
> people want to see), it's likely to combine the worst of both
> forms.
>
> For the best of what "televised" theatre can be, check out Stage On
> Screen's
> adaptations of Gurney and others. It's a hybrid form that stays true
> to
> theatrical roots -- or as much as it can.
>
> You also say that lots of theatre is elitist or out of touch.
> All the more reason to follow the companies that prize language,
> offer
> stories that provoke and great acting/writing. Live theatre. That
> speaks to
> people. Not new media stuff that potentially adds to the dreck and
> dross of
> the Internet.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> To [un]subscribe to the rat-list, send an email to
> "majordomo@ratconference.com"
> with [un]subscribe rat-list" in the body of the message.
> For information on other functions send a message containing the
> word
> "help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
> ---------------------------------------
> You may also [un]subscribe on the web at
> http://www.ratconference.com/cgi-bin/web_domo.pl?list=rat-list
>
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
---------------------------------------
To [un]subscribe to the rat-list, send an email to "majordomo@ratconference.com"
with [un]subscribe rat-list" in the body of the message.
For information on other functions send a message containing the word
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
---------------------------------------
You may also [un]subscribe on the web at http://www.ratconference.com/cgi-bin/web_domo.pl?list=rat-list
>>
---------------------------------------
To [un]subscribe to the rat-list, send an email to "majordomo@ratconference.com"
with [un]subscribe rat-list" in the body of the message.
For information on other functions send a message containing the word
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
---------------------------------------
You may also [un]subscribe on the web at http://www.ratconference.com/cgi-bin/web_domo.pl?list=rat-list