[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RAT There's nothing wrong with being elitist....



I have to agree with JG, if only in principle...
 
A masterpeice, that is brilliance, is a striving, a commitment to an ideal, an effort worthy of note...something which goes beyond an idea of an aesthetic quality and plums the very depths of achievment; an expression which is timeless and also without comparison in it's genre. This is *above* populism or elitism.
 
RE: The Way I read Artaud, (and if I recall the essay correctly)the (no more) Masterpieces diatribe was directed more as opposition to the idea that we ought to cling to the great works of the past as a guide or standard for what ought to come next. I don't think he meant to do away with great works completely, he just wanted to seperate the IDEA of 'creating a masterpiece' from the act of expression, freeing it from the bondage that many artists feel to be 'successful' in what might be termed a 'conventional' way so that a 'true ' masterpiece might be born' and brilliance be measured by the striving and honesty invested. It was much the same for Brecht- in most of his writing about the theatre- that is, in between political diatribe and self-promotion- he seems to be seaching for a *genuinely* shared point of reference from which to communicate- a populist ideal .
 
I think it is also relevant to note that many of us who would strive for the same result feel the same way- we want nothing so much as to have or provide universal access to the truth we feel we have to share, and the ideas and expressions that are so powerful, yet when it comes right down to it, we are unable ourselves to overcome the feelings of disgust we have for 'popular' culture-feelings which are a product of the very clarity we have about the insipidness of most popular culture.  In order to overcome this and be able to relate to the audience, we have to address this on some level. The only way to get away from masterpeices is to create our own and be patient; the only way to avoid the plaugue is to recoginze wher it came from. The most efficient way to reach the masses is to go to them and look and sound like them, and THEN they will listen, and THEN we can say what's really on our minds...
 
 
Skip
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: RAT There's nothing wrong with being elitist....

In a message dated 2/2/01 5:07:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
handycapt@yahoo.com writes:


sticking your tongue out at a masterpiece
just because it doesn't fit your mood at the moment
doesn't mean you want find yourself returning to
appreaciate it in the end.


shooting for a masterpiece is an action. the masterpiece is
not something already done - ever.
it is a striving.
If you do not strive for a masterpiece effort, you learn nothing new.

It is found in the clearness of your intention to speak directly to your
partners on stage. It has nothing to do with the audience. The audience will
only participate if you are striving for clear communication with your
partner. Enough about the audience! What's going on stage??? Or as Anne
Bogart might say, Where's the meat???
Sending your movie in your whole being, on text, straight like an arrow into
your partner. The completion of this simple task is an action. Anything less
than that remains simply a movement and nothing more, thus no masterpiece. A
masterpiece is striving, Herculean striving, and the necessity must be found
in the work, to give it voice.
The rest is intellegentia garbage.

JMG, freehold