[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: RAT There's nothing wrong with being elitist....



I agree.  I think that if you're being true to your own artistic bent, then you are not pandering--whether that bent is to be a member of the Backstreet Boys or to be Laurie
Anderson.
 
I personally think it's more "elitist" to produce one's art based merely on what you think the public wants than to produce work that you believe in and are excited about.  You are then talking down to the audience rather than trusting them.
 
Is Jackson Pollack an elitist because he didn't sell portraits in the mall?
 
Thinking lately about Artaud's point in "No more masterpieces" that art and theatre must be products of their age and not moldy musty masterpieces that anyone of culture and education feels they must go to see and yet which no one actually enjoys anymore. ("Watch this--it's good for you.")
 
When we are all octagenarians, what we thought was cutting edge theatre or entertainment in 2001 may be ridiculed by upstart young elitist theatre practitioners.
 
Laura Winton
fluffysingler@prodigy.net
www.karawane.org
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:22 AM
Subject: RAT There's nothing wrong with being elitist....

(Well, there are actually a few things wrong with it, esp. if you end up
making value judgements or sneering at the people who are not in your elite
group, but what the heck)

What I'm trying to say is that it's okay to be an artist for the few rather
than the many, and it's okay to be an artist for the many, too, as long as
your artwork isn't PANDERING to the many.

It's always an aesthetic call about what is "real art" and what is
"pandering art"  Even Kenny G or New Kids on the Block  think that are doing
great and original work, and lo and behold, people value their work in no
small quantity.

I personally value different things in a piece of theatrical artwork then
most other people do.  It doesn't make me better than other people (although
I can say that I'm certainly more knowledgeable) it just makes me unhappier
about the stuff I see.

Most people who go to the Lion King or Cirque du Soleil have the time of
their lives-- it is we few (we unhappy few) that see the flaws in the
diamonds, the slow pacing, the weakness in story, the sure but clear
Disneyfication of worldwide culture, etc.  Most people don't see it, and are
happy to shell out their hard earned (or not so hard earned, sometimes) loot
for these pleasures, and wouldn't pay a fig to see Peter Stein, Augusto
Boal, or the less well known (like you and me) bleed for them on the
pavement.

That's the way of the world.

Signed,

An unpopular artist working in the popular theatre
(which turns out, isn't so popular after all!)

=~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~
Adam Gertsacov  b.c., c.b., & B.C.
(boss clown, chief bottlewasher, and Big Cheese)
Acme Clown Company
http://www.acmeclown.com  or http://www.trainedfleas.com
adam@acmeclown.com
"damn everything but the circus"  ee cummings
ELECTION T-SHIRTS:  http://www.acmeclown.com/electile.html
ACME CLOWN MONTH:  http://www.acmeclown.com/greenbelt/
=~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~ =~=~=~-

To [un]subscribe to the rat-list, send an email to "majordomo@ratconference.com"
with [un]subscribe rat-list" in the body of the message.
For information on other functions send a message containing the word
"help" to the same address. Do not use quotes in your message.
------
You may also [un]subscribe on the web at http://www.ratconference.com/cgi-bin/web_domo.pl?list=rat-list