Re: RAT questions

[NOMADMONAD@aol.com]

At 10:03 AM 8/4/00 -0400, P1d2o3b@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/4/00 8:57:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time, 
audiemccall@yahoo.com writes:

>> To assume that theatre must "effect change" (a
>>  seductive assumption, admittedly, but nevertheless
>>  dubious) and then throw up one's hands and say it's "a
>>  crap shoot" what kind of change you're effecting seems
>>  disingenuous and callous.
>>  

>also stupic

QUESTION #4  Is the above "stupic" spelling due to callousness, 
disingenuousness, or stupidity?

Theater for me is an act of faith.  A time and place of vulnerability, not 
willful intent.

The moral trepidation of Abraham carrying his only son Isaac up Mount Moriah 
for the sacrafice.

see Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling 

http://home.pacbell.net/newcov/sk/kw6a.htm

Keats spoke of mystery, doubt, uncertainty.

But Artaud probably spoke most precisely: "To act is to kill."