Re: RAT THE SUPERBOWL?

[P1d2o3b@aol.com]

In a message dated 02/02/100 1:02:50 PM EST, luciemanheim@hotmail.com writes:

> Satisfied with what?  your hostile prattling to an honest question?  Your 
>  self-referential, "fun" TV and Board Game references?
>  Sure I'm satisfied.  If you are.

I really am going back to work, b u t.... 
can't resist an invitation to  
participatorily theatrically tsk.

Pretend we just left a performance of your exchange staged.

His line, 
>
>p1.  I eat lots of corn.  I like corn.  

I lol ed, and didn't I just read, that  by thy involuntary laugh 
thee shall know thy comic genius. 

His line,
>p2.

>I want to locate or remake all the toys I had in childhood.  

Now, I myself was not personally interested in the particular
referrents that followed hence I didn't recopy.  B U T on this list I've 
encountered
sharers in my passion for Innana and Enkidu, and I've made a board
game or two; For both I was heartily criticized as self indulgent, 
monopolizing with private trivia time and space better spent advancing 
whatever it was my critics
wanted.  He may just find here a collaborator with whom he will do 
something extraordinary.  Serious exhibits are mounted and articles 
written about toys.  That  one finds trivial, another's self  referential  
fun,
renders it neither hostile nor prattle to all; maybe the author, maybe not.

>p3 I am going to bring Neil Simon back into vogue. 
None of that interested me either, but I think I just didn't get it.


p1

>