[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: RAT bitchslapping
john sylvain, i love you more.
by the way, it is the combined impact of everything which will eventually
"kill" you. every stimulus you receive requires the firing of a certain number
of electrical sparks by synapses which will eventually wear out like any fuse.
sometimes juices must be pumped by various glands and organs as a result of the
fired sparks and all the gaskets and pipes and all that jazz are subject to
clogging and failing over time, just as they are in your home. i think art and
all that it involves -- sitting up late with gleason and john howling at the
solstice moon, smoking cigars and drinking brandy with mitchell in the back
yard, getting e-bitchslapped by rob while he touches himself in texas -- will
wear you out faster than cheeseburgers. the safest thing to do if you want to
live a long time is to find a dark corner and watch the TV on the inside of
your eyelids. you will have to be able to afford to have someone put fuel and
lubrication into you but peristalisis in and of itself is very low impact.
love
mab
"Sylvain, John" wrote:
> " A cheeseburger is the more complicated vs the Big Mac. I
> wonder, could you enlighten us as to the logic used in comparing ART
> to FAST
> FOOD? cause I know one will eventually kill you, while the other is
> meant to
> nourish...or maybe that's your problem."
>
> This deserves a bit of attention. What does Mr. Skipworthy mean here. Will
> ART eventually kill you, while FAST FOOD is meant to nourish....or is it the
> other way around?
>
> Well I like it this way.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen-Skip- Newell [SMTP:skipworthy@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 7:05 PM
> > To: rat-list@whirl-i-gig.com
> > Subject: Re: RAT bitchslapping
> >
> > KSTUART said-
> >
> > >Mr. Nash-- if your bitchslap is as weak as your thought process, it might
> >
> > >be
> > >hard for you to "bitch" slap your way out of a paper bag....
> >
> > As a matter of fact, Rob's point is quite clear and succint and direct (
> > as
> > I have found his thoughts usually are). And he doesn't hand out bitchslaps
> >
> > lightly, or waste his words.
> >
> >
> >
> > >I mean, MUST we
> > >get macho over the internet? Excuse me but it shows just what a pussy
> > you
> > >really are.
> >
> > Macho ? Nashgay? hmmm. Seems you're the one with masculinity issues..words
> >
> > like 'pussy' ? phrases like '...your way out of a paper bag? Just what is
> > it
> > you're trying to prove ? All he said, twice, was that he *ahem* DOESN'T
> > LIKE
> > COLLAGES. I don't particularly find them stimulating either. I think
> > they're
> > a weak choice, artistically- by using many ideas at once, rather than
> > committing ot and exploring one or even three, you reduce the entire piece
> >
> > to Lowest-common-denominator art, which usually ends up bieng either
> > patronizing or insipid or both. And I KNOW I aint no PUSSY.
> >
> >
> > >Use WORDS as they say in NURSERY SCHOOL-- thinking words not
> > >fighting ones, because it's awfully safe there behind the keyboard in
> > >Texas.
> > > (or wherever you are). Do you think every 'collage' is the same? As if
> >
> > >you
> > >were comparing, say, the BIG MAC to (let's call that a collage food) to a
> > >plain old CHEESEBURGER. (The more carefully plotted food product) --
> > It's
> > >all a bit more complicated than that.
> >
> > Interesting. A cheeseburger is the more complicated vs the Big Mac. I
> > wonder, could you enlighten us as to the logic used in comparing ART to
> > FAST
> > FOOD? cause I know one will eventually kill you, while the other is meant
> > to
> > nourish...or maybe that's your problem. They never taught you that while
> > you
> > in nursery school ( or perhaps you were too busy learning to parse terms
> > like 'Pussy'.
> >
> >
> > [Delivers another bitchslap ]
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com